AnatomyofaFraud.com
MENU OF EVIDENCE

Mail: bob@fontainesdomains.com
Home Home2 Menu False Statements Smoking Gun

*Notice - some of these links may open up to other web pages. I’ve been doing this a lot of years.

Complete Scam Page - Identifies 10 of the strongest items of evidence establishing CCT’s fraud, and Lawyers Perjury. *You could discount 2,3,4 or more, because ANY ONE proves this is a fraud.

The 2016 Letter - 101 pages I sent to CCT lawyers, detailing every sinister aspect of her clients scam, and I Identify her own false statements and those of Co-Counsel. They sent cops to my home instead.

Lawyers send PD to my home - in Reply to the 2016 letter. The Barnstable firm with the retired Barnstable Judge, convinced the Barnstable PD to send the Yarmouth PD to my home, for a “warning”.

Litigation Page  - details the litigation history. From US First Circuit in 2007, Barnstable Superior in 2008, Mass Appeals Court 2012/2013, Mass SJC, Barnstable again, Mass Bar Counsel, etc..

Fake Projection Page - explains how CCT created and gave to me with July 02 Offer To Purchase, a FAKE $4,3100,000 revenue projection for our 2002-2006 sale, while hiding the real $1,300,000 Plan.

October 16, 2002 Page - shows the email evidence proving CCT was actively concealing their plans to Bundles, 2 weeks prior to the Oct 31, 02 p&s, AND had ALTERED the singed P&S Agreement.

The January 9, 2003  - “Bundle proposal” is completely fake evidence, as top CCT Management to pretended to invent “Bundles”, 70 days after Oct 31/02 p&s, to divert $3,000,000 from sale price.

Smoking Gun Page - Explains how CCT was caught hiding Bundles from me in 2002, establishing the January 9, 2003 Bundle proposal was a sham, and they have all lied to judges.

The False Statements of Counsel - under the penalty of perjury, present to a court of law, in exchange for a significant legal fee. I isolate those statements where the lawyers contradict their own client.

A Pro Se Litigant’s Experience - with the Courts of the Commonwealth, litigating against a company owned by Dow Jones, then news Corp, then Gatehouse Media. When judges let lawyers lie under oath.

2006 Whistle blower Complaint to Dow Jones, accusing employer CCT of requiring me to give inflated circulation numbers to clients, to secure ad contracts. BEFORE I knew they had done to same to me.

The C21 Fraud 6 months in CCT FORCES ME to give false circulation figures to advertisers. The Retaliation against me by CCT when years later it caused me to be Hospitalized.

Key links to Motions, Rulings and Evidence.


CCT 6/14/11 Memo in Support of SJ backing Fake Jan 9 03 Evidence.

Barnstable 5/2/12 SJ Ruling relying on the false evidence of that Memo.
*False Statements of Counsel  itemized, showing  HOW Barnstable was Deceived.

Fontaine Exhibits .pdf  Including signed Signed P&S (Exh #14).

My Mass SJC Court Motion for Further Appellate Review. (SJC Docket)
Rule 60b Motion 2nd: fontainesdomains.com/DMM/page16.html

My Rule 60b Motion: Fontainesdomains.com/DMM/rule60facts.html

My Opp to CCT “Motion seeking Protection, from me!


I’ve told my story so many times over so many years, under dozens of
powerful medications, that I don't remember creating most of these.

Video of  5 years ago - I detail the evidence item by item.
2nd Video - This was Titled A Lyin Shame. Details evidence.
This was made 5 years ago, 1:22 Long. Was FontainevCapeCodTimes.com.
This was an hour 22 as well - 5 years ago. Must have made 2 by mistake, I was ill.
Yet another breakdown. Domain name was ThePerjuryOfCapeCodTimes.com.
This is original www.AnatomyofAFraud.com, so most recent, till this update.


Appeals Court Ruling - 12/23/13.

My Appeal Brief:fontainesdomains.com/DMM//Brief.html

My Reply Brief: fontainesdomains.com/DMM/AppellantReplyBrief.html
My Appeals Court Petition For ReHearing.
Appeals Docket: www.ma-appellatecourts.org/displayno=2012-P-1085

Now  180+ months later, interest is $1,800,000, plus the $1,000,000 trebled, plus attorneys fees. And now we have two law firms lying to courts, damages should also rise from each. And if perjury is still a crime, I believe there is considerable exposure there too. And the culpability of individuals who have broken the law should be considered, Piercing the Corporate Veil comes to mind.

CCT has sworn that “the only substantiated evidence establishes that the CCTimes conceived of the print and internet bundling strategy in early 2003, after the execution of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, and that no representations concerning internet bundling were made to Fontaine whatsoever during the negotiations of the Purchase and Sale Agreement”

If CCT innocently thought up Bundles in Jan 2003, then Kempf and Evans 2010 Depositions are false, both admit 2002 Bundles.
6/14/11 in SOF #52, I forced NM&F to admit CCT’s own records prove they expected $73,000 in 02 Bundle revenue, for This Sale.
3/15/13 H&K’s appeal brief said the 2002 Smoking Gun - with Bundles, was “disclosed and presented” during 2002 negotiations.

6/14/11 - a different  NM&F lawyer filed CCT’s SJ Memo vouching for evidence that CCT conceived of Bundles January 9, 2003.
3/15/13 - The SAME H&K lawyer who swore Bundles were disclosed in 2002, ALSO swears they were conceived on Jan 9, 2003.

Unfortunately, the Courts missed the evidence and admissions of CCT itself, which prove January 9, 03 is impossible.
The Court SHOULD realize that if Jan 9, 2003 is legitimate, then Kempf, Evans, NM&F and H&K have false affidavits on record.

MENU - On this page I identify and link to the various pages of content relating to 2002 fraud by CCT and the Litigation Fraud of it’s lawyers, Both firms.

The Primary vehicle in CCT’s 2002 fraudulent acquisition of my Cape Cod Real Estate Internet Advertising business, was plotting to conceal their “Advertising Bundles”. Pretending to invent them on Jan 9, 2003, 70 days after they tricked me into signing an Altered p&s, To divert millions from sale price.

I sued CCT in 2007 In US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for fraudulent inducement, contract fraud, and violations of Mass 93a Consumer Protection Laws. We sought rescission of the sale and $1,000,000 damages. That was before discovery and I found out just how much they had stolen, hidden.

Had the Court considered the evidence instead of lawyer affidavits, it would see that CCT’s Bundles were NOT “conceived” on Jan 9, 2003 Bundle Proposal that CCT has proffered to the courts as absolute evidence of their innocence, and the $1,000,000 would have been trebled under 93a, and 1% interest would incur by law @ 1% per month for every month since the 2002 fraud itself . And evidence, all belonging to CCT itself, proves the January 9, 03 Bundle evidence is a complete sham!

And just like their filthy client had used Jan 9 to defraud me in the underlying crime, so to have lawyers used it to deceive several courts of Law.

The Courts need only the Smoking Gun to see why BOTH are so wrong!

Menu of Evidence Unraveling this Complex Scam

When you consider the evidence of multiple lawyers filing false affidavits in the matter, consider the Mass Bar article that describes the lawyers duty to report EACH OTHER!